India sent notice to Pakistan, the Indus water treaty was in danger! this is the big reason
Indus Water Treaty of 1960: Pakistan refused to discuss it in five meetings of the Permanent Indus Commission from 2017 to 2022, despite India’s continuous efforts to find a mutually acceptable way. He said that on the persistent insistence of Pakistan, the World Bank recently initiated the processes of neutral expert and arbitration court.
Highlights
- The notice has been issued due to Islamabad’s adamant stand on implementing the treaty
- Pakistan’s actions adversely affected the provisions and implementation of the Indus Waters Treaty
- India and Pakistan signed the treaty in 1960 after nine years of negotiations
New Delhi. India has issued a notice to Pakistan for an amendment to the Indus Water Treaty of 1960. Giving this information on Friday, government sources said that this notice has been issued by Islamabad due to its stand on the implementation of the treaty. Sources said that this notice was sent through the Indus Water Commissioners on 25 January. He said that India has been a firm supporter and a responsible partner in implementing the Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan in letter and spirit.
Sources said, “Pakistan’s actions adversely affected the provisions and implementation of the Indus Waters Treaty and compelled India to issue appropriate notice for its amendment”. After negotiations, the treaty was signed in 1960. The World Bank was also included in the signatories of this treaty. According to this treaty, except for some exceptions, India can use the water of the eastern rivers without restriction. Under the provisions related to India, India was given the right to use the water of the Ravi, Satluj, and Beas rivers for transportation, electricity, and agriculture.
In the year 2015, Pakistan requested the appointment of a neutral expert to investigate technical objections to the Indian Kishanganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects. In the year 2016, Pakistan unilaterally withdrew from this request and proposed to take these objections to the Court of Arbitration. Sources said that this unilateral step of Pakistan is in violation of the mechanism created for the settlement of disputes in Article 9 of the treaty.
Accordingly, India made a separate request to refer the matter to a neutral expert. “The possibility of launching two processes simultaneously on the same question and leading to inconsistent or contradictory results would create an unprecedented and legally untenable situation that could jeopardize the Indus Water Treaty,” the source said. The bank acknowledged this in 2016 and decided to stop running two parallel processes while urging India and Pakistan to find a mutually compatible way forward.
Sources said that despite repeated efforts by India to find a mutually acceptable way out, Pakistan refused to discuss it in five meetings of the Permanent Indus Commission from 2017 to 2022. He said that on the persistent insistence of Pakistan, the World Bank recently initiated the processes of neutral expert and arbitration court. He said that parallel consideration of the same issue does not come under the purview of the provisions of the Indus Water Treaty. Sources said that in this way, India was forced to give notice of the amendment in view of the violation of the provisions of the Indus Water Treaty.
India and Pakistan signed the treaty in 1960 after nine years of negotiations
The Indus Waters Treaty is a water-sharing treaty between India and Pakistan, signed in 1960 after nine years of negotiations. The treaty was brokered by the World Bank and allocated the use of the Indus River and its tributaries between the two countries. The treaty has been in effect since 1960 and has been seen as a model for water-sharing agreements between countries.
It’s unclear from your statement what is the specific reason for the notice issued by Pakistan, but in general, the treaty has faced some challenges over the years. Both countries have accused each other of violating the treaty and have taken steps to restrict the flow of water to another country.
In recent years, there have been tensions between India and Pakistan over the treaty, and the Indian government has taken steps to build dams and hydroelectric projects on the Indus River, which has raised concerns in Pakistan. In response, Pakistan has been taking steps to raise the issue in the international community and has been seeking the intervention of the World Bank and other organizations to resolve the dispute.
It’s important to note that the Indus Waters Treaty is an important agreement between the two countries, and any violation or non-compliance with the treaty can have serious implications on the water availability and agriculture of both countries.
- The Indus Waters Treaty is a water-sharing treaty between India and Pakistan, signed in 1960 after nine years of negotiations, brokered by the World Bank and it allocates the use of the Indus River and its tributaries between the two countries.
- The treaty has been in effect since 1960 and has been seen as a model for water-sharing agreements between countries, however over the years the treaty faced some challenges.
- Both countries have accused each other of violating the treaty and have taken steps to restrict the flow of water to the other country
- In recent years, there have been tensions between India and Pakistan over the treaty, and the Indian government has taken steps to build dams and hydroelectric projects on the Indus River, which has raised concerns in Pakistan.
- In response, Pakistan has been taking steps to raise the issue in the international community and has been seeking the intervention of the World Bank and other organizations to resolve the dispute.
- The treaty is important for both countries as it can have serious implications for the water availability and agriculture of both countries. Any violation or non-compliance with the treaty can cause serious problems for the people of both countries.
- It’s important for both countries to work together to resolve any disputes and to ensure that the treaty is implemented in a fair and equitable manner.
