America gave a big statement, calling the violent activities of Khalistani supporters terrorism
US State Department spokesman Ned Price also described the violent acts of Khalistani supporters as a part of terrorism. He clarified that “That’s why we condemn terrorism. We condemn violent extremism. We condemn all those who resort to violence to achieve their goals.”
Image Source: ANI Ned Price, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson, America
America on Khalistan: US State Department spokesman Ned Price termed the violent acts of Khalistani supporters as a part of terrorism and said that America strongly condemns all forms of terrorism. He gave this answer when he was asked a question in a press conference in the context of violent incidents happening in Australia by Khalistani supporters in recent times. US State Department spokesman Ned Price said that the United States strongly condemns terrorism in all its forms. All such people who resort to violence to achieve their wrong goals are terrorists. Be it political or otherwise. His reference was to the violent incidents of Khalistani supporters. He clarified that ” That is why we condemn terrorism in all its forms. We condemn terrorism. We condemn violent extremism. We condemn all those who resort to violence to achieve their goals.
On Khalistan activists, US says “we condemn terrorism in all its forms”
Read @ANI Story | https://t.co/FsWkhjLYrU#US #khalistanactivists #terrorism pic.twitter.com/5iq9mofkwT
— ANI Digital (@ani_digital) March 9, 2023
Terrorism a threat to regional and global peace: Ned Price
Ned Price said that there is no justification for resorting to violence. He said that we strongly condemn terrorism around the world. He described terrorism in all its forms as a threat to regional and global security.
Australia has also condemned Khalistani supporters
Earlier recently, Australia had also clarified its stand on the misdeeds of Khalistani supporters going on in their country. Asserting Australia’s unwavering respect for India’s sovereignty, Australian High Commissioner Barry O’Farrell clarified that there is no legal basis for the Khalistan referendum in his country. Speaking to reporters, O’Farrell said Australians were horrified by incidents of vandalism at places of worship, including in Brisbane. “Police are actively pursuing those responsible for these incidents,” the Australian High Commissioner said. “Australia’s respect for Indian sovereignty is unwavering,” he said. He said the Australian government has made it clear that the plebiscite being conducted by Khalistan “has no legal recognition in Australia or India”.
Khalistani supporters terrorism
It is not accurate or fair to generalize that all supporters of Khalistan are terrorists or support terrorism. Khalistan is a controversial issue that involves the demand for a separate Sikh homeland in India. While there have been some individuals and groups who have resorted to violent means to push for this demand, it is important to recognize that this is not representative of all Khalistani supporters.
It is important to distinguish between the peaceful expression of political views and violent extremism. Just as not all proponents of Scottish independence are terrorists, not all Khalistani supporters advocate or engage in violence.
Moreover, it is important to acknowledge the complexity of the Khalistan issue and the historical context behind it. The demand for Khalistan is rooted in the perception of marginalization and discrimination against Sikhs in India, particularly in the aftermath of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. While this does not justify violence or terrorism, it does highlight the need for a nuanced and constructive dialogue to address the underlying grievances and concerns of the Sikh community in India.
It is important to condemn and take action against all forms of terrorism and violent extremism, regardless of the ideology or cause that is being espoused. However, it is also important to recognize that labelling an entire group of people as terrorists or supporters of terrorism based on their political beliefs is not helpful or accurate.
Some additional points to consider:
- While it is true that there have been some instances of violence and terrorism associated with the Khalistan movement, it is important to note that the vast majority of Khalistani supporters do not engage in or condone such actions. Many Khalistanis, both in India and abroad, have advocated for their cause through peaceful means such as protests, lobbying, and political engagement.
- It is also important to note that the Indian government has been criticized for its heavy-handed response to the Khalistan movement, including allegations of human rights abuses against Sikh activists and separatists. Some have argued that this has contributed to radicalization and the resort to violent means by some Khalistani supporters.
- The Khalistan issue is complex and multifaceted, and it is important to engage in a constructive dialogue with all stakeholders to find a peaceful and sustainable resolution. This includes addressing the historical and political grievances of the Sikh community in India, as well as ensuring that their rights and interests are respected and protected within a democratic and pluralistic society.
- The international community has an important role to play in promoting a peaceful resolution to the Khalistan issue. This includes engaging with both the Indian government and Sikh activists and organizations, supporting efforts to address grievances and promote dialogue, and condemning all forms of violence and terrorism.
- The Khalistan movement is not a monolithic entity and includes a diverse range of opinions and approaches. While some Khalistani supporters advocate for a separate Sikh state, others seek greater autonomy or political representation for Sikhs within India. There are also differences in tactics, with some supporting peaceful means of protest and others resorting to violence.
- It is important to recognize that the Sikh community in India has faced discrimination and marginalization, particularly in the aftermath of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. Many Sikhs feel that their grievances have not been adequately addressed by the Indian government, and this has fueled support for the Khalistan movement.
- However, it is also important to acknowledge that there are legitimate concerns about the potential impact of a separate Khalistan state on the stability and unity of India. The Indian government has argued that the demand for Khalistan is a threat to national security, and has taken a hardline approach to suppress the movement.
- It is crucial to promote a constructive and peaceful dialogue between all stakeholders to address the underlying grievances and concerns of the Sikh community in India. This includes engaging with both Khalistani supporters and the Indian government to find a resolution that respects the rights and interests of all parties involved.
- The international community can play a role in supporting efforts to promote peace and stability in India and the wider South Asian region. This includes providing diplomatic support for constructive dialogue and peaceful resolution of the Khalistan issue, as well as advocating for the protection of human rights and the rule of law in India.
[…] khalistani | Khalistani supporters terrorism | America on Khalistan | America | Australia | khalista… […]
[…] khalistani | Khalistani supporters terrorism | America on Khalistan | America | Australia | khalista… […]
[…] khalistani | Khalistani supporters terrorism | America on Khalistan | America | Australia | khalista… […]